British 2yo Racing - Trainer Extra Stats for R. M. Flower

BRITISH 2yo RACING - Trainer Extra Statistics Page

Trainer's Stats Page 1
[Trainer's 2015 Page]

Trainers 2001-15 Index

	First Time Out (FTO) Profit & Loss : · P&L for all Runners · P&L by Month Groups · P&L by Distance	Second Time Out (STO) Profit & Loss : · P&L for all Runners · P&L by Month Groups · P&L by Distance
	First Time Out (FTO) Average [Estimates] · All Runners by Season Winner & Non-Winners · Winner to Non-Winners by Debut Month Group · Winner to Non-Winners by Debut Distance	Percentage of Winners in Debut Index Slice · Breakdown of winners in first 50% of Debut Index · Breakdown of winners in first 20% of Debut Index
	Winners to Runners by Source · Winners to Runners by Sales Price or Owner Bred

R. M. Flower (East Sussex)

FTO Profit & Loss for all Runners

SEASON	2yo Runners	FTO Winners	Total Win SP	Profit/Loss
2003	1	0	0	-1
2004	0	-	-	-
2005	3	0	0	-3
2006	3	0	0	-3
2007	1	0	0	-1

Note: FTO = 'First Time Out' and denotes a horse's debut run as a 2yo. A run for a new trainer or a first run in Britain by a horse who has already competed abroad are not included in the table data.

The table gives the total number of 2yo runners the trainer had each season and how many won FTO. The final column shows the total Profit or Loss if you had placed a level stake win bet on all of the stable's 2yo debut runners at the reported starting price (SP). The cell will be in light Pink if a loss would have resulted from the bets, light Green for a profit and white for breaking even or in the case where there are no debut runners.

Back to Top of Page

R. M. Flower (East Sussex)

FTO Profit & Loss split by Month Group

SEASON

MAR - MAY

JUN - AUG

SEP - NOV

2003

-1

2004

2005

-1

-2

2006

-2

-1

2007

-1

Note: The First figure in each cell in the number of FTO winners during those months of the season. The second figure is the total level stakes profit or loss resulting from betting on all of the trainer's debut runners in that period.

The table breaks down the data presented in the previous section by three Month Groups. It is possible that a trainer can produce a profit in one of the Month Group periods while recording a loss across the whole season (or vice versa). The total number of FTO winners in the three cells should total to the figure presented in the "FTO Winners Column" in the last section.

Back to Top of Page

R. M. Flower (East Sussex)

FTO Profit & Loss split by Race Distance

SEASON

5f - 5.5f

5.6f - 6.5f

6.6f - 7.5f

7.6f - 8.5f

8.6f +

2003

-1

2004

2005

-2

-1

2006

-1

-2

2007

-1

Note: The First figure in each cell is the number of FTO winners in each of the Race Distance Groups. The second figure is the total level stakes profit or loss resulting from betting on all of the trainer's debut runners at that race distance. British racecourses run races over intermediate, and non-standard, distances therefore a '6f' group includes all races from 5.6 furlongs up to 6.5 for example.

The table breaks down the data presented in the first section of the page by five Race Distance Groups. It is possible that a trainer can produce a profit in one, or more, of the Race Distance Groups while recording a loss across the whole season (or vice versa). The total number of FTO winners in the five cells should total to the figure presented in the "FTO Winners Column" in the first section.

Back to Top of Page

R. M. Flower (East Sussex)

STO Profit & Loss for all Runners

SEASON	STO Runners	STO Winners	Total Win SP	Profit/Loss
2003	1	0	0	-1
2004	0	-	-	-
2005	2	0	0	-2
2006	1	0	0	-1
2007	1	0	0	-1

Note: STO = 'Second Time Out' and denotes a horse's second run as a 2yo.

The table gives the total number of 2yo runners the trainer had each season and how many won STO. Not all of the stable's 2yos may have run more than once. The final column shows the total Profit or Loss if you had placed a level stake win bet on all of the stable's 2yo STO runners at the reported starting price (SP). The cell will be in light Pink if a loss would have resulted from the bets, light Green for a profit and white for breaking even or in the case where there are no debut runners.

Back to Top of Page

R. M. Flower (East Sussex)

STO Profit & Loss split by Month Group

SEASON

MAR - MAY

JUN - AUG

SEP - NOV

2003

-1

2004

2005

-1

2006

-1

2007

-1

Note: The First figure in each cell in the number of STO winners during those months of the season. The second figure is the total level stakes profit or loss resulting from betting on all of the trainer's second time out runners in that period.

The table breaks down the data presented in the previous section by three Month Groups. It is possible that a trainer can produce a profit in one of the Month Group periods while recording a loss across the whole season (or vice versa). The total number of STO winners in the three cells should total to the figure presented in the "STO Winners Column" in the last section.

Back to Top of Page

R. M. Flower (East Sussex)

STO Profit & Loss split by Race Distance

SEASON

5f - 5.5f

5.6f - 6.5f

6.6f - 7.5f

7.6f - 8.5f

8.6f +

2003

-1

2004

2005

-1

2006

-1

2007

-1

Note: The First figure in each cell is the number of STO winners in each of the Race Distance Groups. The second figure is the total level stakes profit or loss resulting from betting on all of the trainer's second time out runners at that race distance. British racecourses run races over intermediate, and non-standard, distances therefore a '6f' group includes all races from 5.6 furlongs up to 6.5 for example.

The table breaks down the data presented in the first "STO P&L" section of the page by five Race Distance Groups. It is possible that a trainer can produce a profit in one, or more, of the Race Distance Groups while recording a loss across the whole season (or vice versa). The total number of STO winners in the five cells should total to the figure presented in the "STO Winners Column" in the first section.

Back to Top of Page

R. M. Flower (East Sussex)

FTO Average [Estimates] by Season Winner & Non-Winners
(All Runners)

SEASON

Winners

Seconds

Thirds

Fourths

Unplaced

2006

[~]

2007

[~]

Note: FTO = 'First Time Out' and denotes a horse's first race outing. B2yoR rates the performances of all 2yos in races during the turf season. These ratings are termed '[Estimates]' and shortened to '[Est]' in the various listings on the site.

Note: The positions 'Winners', 'Seconds', 'Thirds', 'Fourths' & 'Unplaced' denote the best positions achieved by each of the trainer's juveniles during their 2yo career. It is not necessarily the placing on debut because a horse could achieve it's best placing on any one of it's runs.

Note: B2yoR [Estimates] were at a generally lower level in 2007, a subject considered in an article on the site.

The first figure in each cell, in bold text and enclosed by square brackets, is the average FTO rating recorded by all of the trainer's 2yos that achieved a best placing of that type during the season. The second figure on the light grey background is the number of 2yos that qualify in that 'Best Placing' group.

Back to Top of Page

R. M. Flower (East Sussex)

Season Winner to Non-winner FTO Average Estimates
split by Month of Debut Group

SEASON

Winners

Mar-May

Jun-Aug

Sep-Nov

Seconds

Mar-May

Jun-Aug

Sep-Nov

Thirds

Mar-May

Jun-Aug

Sep-Nov

Fourths

Mar-May

Jun-Aug

Sep-Nov

Unplaced

Mar-May

Jun-Aug

Sep-Nov

2006

[~]

2007

[~]

R. M. Flower (East Sussex)

Season Winner to Non-winner FTO Average Estimates
split by Race Distance of Debut

SEASON

Winners

Seconds

Thirds

Fourths

Unplaced

2006

[~]

2007

[~]

Note: FTO = 'First Time Out' and denotes a horse's first race outing. B2yoR rates the performances of all 2yos in races during the turf season. These ratings are termed '[Estimates]' and shortened to '[Est]' in the various listings on the site.

Note: The positions 'Winners', 'Seconds', 'Thirds', 'Fourths' & 'Unplaced' denote the best positions achieved by each of the trainer's juveniles during their 2yo career. It is not necessarily the placing on debut because a horse could achieve it's best placing on any one of it's runs.

The table shows the average FTO [Estimate] data given in the first part of the 'FTO Average Estimate' section broken down by five Race Distance Groupings.

Back to Top of Page

R. M. Flower (East Sussex)

Breakdown of winners in first 50% of Debut Index

SEASON	Total Runners	Total Winners	Runners in First 50%	Percent of first 50% that won	Percent of Total Winners in first 50%
2006	3	0	2	0 %	0 %
2007	1	0	0	0 %	0 %

Note: 'Debut Index' = if a trainer has, for example, ten 2yo debuts in a season you can order them from earliest to latest as 1 to 10. This numbering is the 'Index'. In this case a 'Slice' refers to taking a percentage of the Index, from the start, to analyse. In the case of the trainer with his ten 2yos a '50% Debut slice' would refer to the first 5 of his juveniles that made their debuts during the season.

The first three columns give information about the number of 2yo runners & winners the trainer had along with the number of runners that qualify for the 'Debut Slice'. The fourth column is the percentage of that 'Slice' that won during the season. The final column is the percentage of all of the stable's winners that were in that sampling.

Back to Top of Page

R. M. Flower (East Sussex)

Breakdown of winners in first 20% of Debut Index

SEASON	Total Runners	Total Winners	Runners in First 20%	Percent of first 20% that won	Percent of Total Winners in first 20%
2006	3	0	1	0 %	0 %
2007	1	0	0	0 %	0 %

Note: 'Debut Index' = if a trainer has, for example, ten 2yo debuts in a season you can order them from earliest to latest as 1 to 10. This numbering is the 'Index'. In this case a 'Slice' refers to taking a percentage of the Index, from the start, to analyse. In the case of the trainer with his ten 2yos a '20% Debut slice' would refer to the first 2 of his juveniles that made their debuts during the season.

The first three columns give information about the number of 2yo runners & winners the trainer had along with the number of runners that qualify for the 'Debut Slice'. The fourth column is the percentage of that 'Slice' that won during the season. The final column is the percentage of all of the stable's winners that were in that sampling.

Back to Top of Page

R. M. Flower (East Sussex)

Winners to Runners by Sales Price or Owner Bred

SEASON	Up to 5k	>5k to 10k	>10k to 20k	>20k to 40k	>40k to 60k	>60k to 100k	>100k	Owner Bred
2005	0-2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
2006	0-2	0-1	-	-	-	-	-	-
2007	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Note: 'k' = one thousand and therefore '5k' means 5,000. The table uses the common unit to be 'Guineas' and sales made in other currencies (Pounds Sterling, Euros, US dollars, etc.) are converted to guineas. A 'Guinea' is £1.05, i.e. one pounds sterling plus 5%. Each grouping refers to sales prices recorded for 2yos that ran for the stable in that price range.

Note: Where the 2yos were not offered at sales but were bred by their owners, for whom they raced, they are denoted as 'Owner Bred'.

The first figure in each cell is the number of winners for the trainer who qualify in that 'Sales Price' grouping. The second figure is the total number of 2yos in that group. Therefore, "4-8" would mean eight 2yos in that group of which four were winners during the season.

Back to Top of Page